Oct 8, 2026 · KJRH / 2 News Oklahoma
DEQ requests more evidence for emissions calculations; agency and OPA respond
KJRH reports that DEQ’s October 7 letter asks OPA to support its calculations and demonstrate that allowable emission increases would not cause federal air-quality violations. DEQ says the proposed ozone-offset rule would not apply to the current application and that proposed emissions are below EPA’s ozone Significant Impact Level. OPA maintains its calculations demonstrate compliance. The request is part of technical review, not a permit approval or denial. Published October 8 locally (October 9 UTC).
Watch video & read on broadcaster site ↗︎Oct 8, 2026 · Oklahoma Attorney General — official statement
Drummond seeks changes to proposed ozone-offset rules; injunction request remains pending
The Attorney General asks DEQ to exclude applications filed before proposed offset rules take effect and raises concerns about geographic and seasonal air-quality impacts. His office describes the preliminary-injunction motion as pending—not granted. This statement presents the Attorney General’s position, not a court ruling; DEQ’s response is covered in the KJRH report above.
Read original report ↗︎Oct 6, 2026 · Public Radio Tulsa
Economist questions omitted fiscal impacts and unresolved electricity costs
Economist Clara Mattei questions the developer-funded REMI study’s exclusion of state and local fiscal impacts and its treatment of electricity costs. OPA says a fuller analysis is forthcoming and its PSO power agreement is not finalized. The quoted $25 monthly bill increase is Mattei’s rough estimate based on a separate PSO grid-upgrade request, not an approved smelter-specific charge.
Read original report ↗︎Sep 23, 2026 · Oklahoma Primary Aluminum — developer release
OPA publishes economic projections and first official project renderings
OPA’s developer-funded REMI study projects $49 billion in cumulative Oklahoma economic impact through 2060 and 1,000+ permanent direct jobs. The separate 7,000-job annual-average projection includes broader economic effects, not 7,000 permanent plant jobs. OPA also released renderings for a 441-acre site and described annual capacity of 750,000 metric tons. These are developer projections, not guaranteed outcomes, approved construction plans or evidence of environmental compliance.
Read original report ↗︎Sep 18, 2026 · KGOU / Oklahoma Public Media Exchange
Tulsa Ports authorizes a challenge to the smelter ballot petition
Reporting on its September 17 meeting, KGOU says the port authority board unanimously authorized counsel to challenge the citizen-led initiative petition behind the April vote. The board did not authorize a lawsuit against the moratorium at that meeting. Authorization to pursue a challenge is not a court ruling invalidating the petition or cancelling the election.
Read original report ↗︎Sep 18, 2026 · Reuters
Reuters examines the next steps and a proposed jurisdiction change
Reuters reports that the Attorney General’s case continues in state court and that Governor Kevin Stitt says the industrial park could leave Inola’s city limits. Reuters notes that state law requires local approval and that how such a move could happen is unclear. This is a proposed possibility, not a completed boundary change. The developers also say an economic-impact study is planned within weeks; the report does not provide its results.
Read original report ↗︎Sep 16, 2026 · Public Radio Tulsa
Developer and governor respond to the moratorium extension
Public Radio Tulsa reports that Oklahoma Primary Aluminum and Tulsa Ports indicated they may challenge the town’s actions. Governor Kevin Stitt also criticized the reversal. Their statements about property rights and constitutionality are the positions of project supporters, not court findings; the September 18 report above describes the port board’s subsequent authorization.
Read original report ↗︎Sep 14, 2026 · KJRH / 2 News Oklahoma
Trustees unanimously extend moratorium and approve April referendum date
KJRH’s post-meeting report confirms that trustees unanimously extended the moratorium through April 7, 2027, and approved an April 7 municipal vote on the proposed smelting ban. Oklahoma Primary Aluminum said it intends to pursue its objections in court. This confirms the meeting outcome, but it is not a permanent ban or a final resolution of the project’s legal and permitting questions.
Read original report ↗︎